Banca de DEFESA: VITÓRIA RANNER PINHEIRO PEREIRA

Uma banca de DEFESA de MESTRADO foi cadastrada pelo programa.
STUDENT : VITÓRIA RANNER PINHEIRO PEREIRA
DATE: 18/01/2024
TIME: 15:00
LOCAL: meet.google.com/fsp-qnte-mfs
TITLE:

 

 

 

TEXTUAL, DISCURSIVE AND ENUNCIATIVE INTERFACES IN THE CRIME AGAINST FEMALE SEXUAL DIGNITY: ANALYSIS FROM THE “MARIANA FERRER” CASE

KEY WORDS:

 

 

 

Textual Analysis of Speeches. Text plan. Enunciative responsibility. Legal discourse. Mariana Ferrer case.

PAGES: 230
BIG AREA: Linguística, Letras e Artes
AREA: Linguística
SUBÁREA: Teoria e Análise Linguística
SUMMARY:

In Brazil, despite the implementation of policies aimed at protecting women in situations of violence, the effectiveness of these measures is often challenged in the face of the continuous growth of crimes against sexual dignity, covering all forms of crime, from harassment to rape and femicides. Additionally, deficiencies in the victim support system contribute to the questionable effectiveness of these policies. As an example, the case of young Brazilian Mariana Borges Ferreira, which gained national and international attention, highlighted the gaps in the judicial system in the treatment provided to victims, especially in cases of rape of a vulnerable person. Given this context, three questions are proposed to guide the research: a) how is the textual plan organized in the discursive genres of the instruction hearing with emphasis on the “victim hearing” section and absolutory sentence?; b) how is the point of view and agency of the voices used in the “victim hearing” hearing section and in the absolutory sentence presented at a linguistic level?; c) what linguistic marks indicate the enunciative responsibility and/or the mediative framework in the “victim hearing” hearing section and in the absolutory sentence?. To answer these questions, we established the general objective of investigating how the text plan, the point of view, the enunciative responsibility and the mediative framework manifest themselves in the discursive genres of instruction hearing and absolutory sentence for crimes against female sexual dignity. Regarding the specific objectives, we propose to identify, describe, analyze and interpret: 1) the organization of the textual plan of the instruction hearing, with emphasis on the “victim's hearing” section and the absolutory sentence; 2) the way in which points of view and voices are mobilized in the “victim hearing” section of the hearing and in the absolutory sentence; 3) the linguistic marks that indicate enunciative responsibility, as well as the mediative framework in the “victim hearing” hearing section and in the absolutory sentence. Due to this scope, we sought to anchor it in the theoretical assumptions of Textual Linguistics, Enunciative Linguistics and Textual Analysis of Discourses. In this direction, we follow authors who work with the text plan, including Adam (2011, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022), Passeggi et al. (2010), Cabral (2013, 2016), Marquesi et al. (2019), Marquesi, Cabral and Rodrigues (2022), Rodrigues and Marquesi (2021), Rodrigues (2022a, 2022b); with point of view theory, based on Rabatel (2005, 2016, 2021a, 2021b), Soares and Rodrigues (2021); with the phenomenon of enunciative responsibility, based on Adam (2011, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022), Rabatel (2016), Passeggi et al. (2010), Rodrigues, Passeggi and Silva Neto (2010), Rodrigues (2017); and, the mediative framework, through the postulates of Guentchéva (1994, 2011). Methodologically, this is a study that is part of a qualitative approach, descriptive and interpretive in nature, using deductive and inductive methods, based on bibliographic and documentary procedures. The research corpus consists of 1 (one) instruction hearing and 1 (one) absolutory sentence, both limited to the case files nº. 0004733-33.2019.8.24.0023, found in the public domain for access in digital environments. The analyzes demonstrate a fixed or conventional text plan in both discursive genres, however, in the “victim's hearing” section, present in the instruction hearing genre, the text plan is occasional, as it presents in its parts, unexpected elements and displaced in relation to the genre or subgenre of the speech. Regarding the point of view and enunciative responsibility, we found that in the instruction hearing there is more evidence, certainly because it is a discursive genre that uses the oral modality of the language, as there is interaction in a spoken language context, possibly establishing conditions so that speakers assume the propositional content of utterances in a situation of syncretism, thus becoming speaker enunciator first (L1/E1); in the absolutory sentence, we noticed that the judge (L1/E1), in some of the examples analyzed, uses multiple voices to support his decision, demonstrating positions of agreement or disagreement regarding the propositional content conveyed by the second enunciators (e2), as in the sections of report and in some parts of the reasoning, while in the “device” section, we identify the L1/E1 PDV and the assumption of the RE.

COMMITTEE MEMBERS:
Presidente - 349685 - MARIA DAS GRACAS SOARES RODRIGUES
Interno - 349707 - LUIS ALVARO SGADARI PASSEGGI
Externa à Instituição - ANA LUCIA TINOCO CABRAL