Banca de DEFESA: JUCILEIDE MARIA DE SANTANA

Uma banca de DEFESA de MESTRADO foi cadastrada pelo programa.
STUDENT : JUCILEIDE MARIA DE SANTANA
DATE: 31/07/2023
TIME: 15:00
LOCAL: REMOTO
TITLE:

A STUDY OF LABOR LITERACY PRACTICES IN DIGITAL CURATION

KEY WORDS:

Language; Discourse; Digital Curation; Multiliteracies; Labor literacy.

 

PAGES: 100
BIG AREA: Linguística, Letras e Artes
AREA: Linguística
SUBÁREA: Linguística Aplicada
SUMMARY:

This research has as a general objective of discussing digital curation as a multiliteracy practice by curators of digital learning objects. In specific terms, it aims to: identify the language concept adopted by curators at process of analysis, evaluation and validation of digital learning objects; describe how a digital process of curation is effective as a practice of multiple literacies to curators and, finally, analyze the discursive and identity positions of curators during the process of analysis, evaluation and validation of digital learning objects. Finally, it analyzes the data what make up the corpus anchored by Literacy Studies (BARTON; LEE, 2015; BARTON; HAMILTON, 1998; KLEIMAN, 1995, 2000, 2005; OLIVEIRA & KLEIMAN, 2008; OLIVEIRA, 2010), highlighting its social and ideological approach (STREET, 1984; 2014). It relies on theoretical assumptions focused on Multiliteracies (ROJO, 2013; BARTON; HAMILTON, 2000); including Digital Literacy (BUZATO, 2012); and Labor Literacy (PAZ, 2008), as well as being supported by discussions on Digital Culture (ANTONIO JUNIOR, 1979; ELIAS, 2022), and on Digital Curation (CARVALHO, 2020; BEAGRIE, 2004). Still, it bases its ideas focused on Language, Discourse and Identity under the theoretical focus defended by Critical Discourse Analysis (FAIRCLOUGH, 2001). This research is inserted in field of Applied Linguistics, henceforth LA, given its interdisciplinary character focused on the field of language, hold by studies of this area (MOITA LOPES, 2006; SIGNORINI, 2001). It assumes the qualitative perspective of ethnographic approach (MOITA LOPES, 1994; CHIZZOTTI, 2006), turning to virtual ethnography (HINE, 2000; 2005; KOZINETS, 2014). The research corpus consists of the transcriptions concerning the applied interviews and the observations made, both through Google Meet, as well as the field notes. The analysis and discussion about the data that make up the aforementioned corpus show that the process of digital curation of digital learning objects constitutes multiliteracy practices, since in order to carry out the aforementioned curatorial practice, curators need to mobilize knowledge related to different areas of knowledge related to the Language Sciences (knowledge related to the linguistic field), to the Computer Sciences (knowledge related to the computational field), to the Education Sciences (knowledge related to the pedagogical field), to the Human Sciences (knowledge destined to the human rights, copyright), Cultural Sciences (knowledge aimed at linking digital learning objects to the social, cultural and educational contexts of students, ODA users). The relevance of the research lies in the contributions that the curatorial practices of digital learning objects bring to ODA users, the promotion of curators' multiliteracies.

COMMITTEE MEMBERS:
Presidente - 1674285 - ANA MARIA DE OLIVEIRA PAZ
Interna - ***.525.604-** - IVONEIDE BEZERRA DE ARAÚJO SANTOS MARQUES - IFRN
Externa à Instituição - NADIA MARIA SILVEIRA COSTA DE MELO - UERN