Banca de QUALIFICAÇÃO: KARLA STEPHANY DE BRITO SILVA

Uma banca de QUALIFICAÇÃO de MESTRADO foi cadastrada pelo programa.
STUDENT : KARLA STEPHANY DE BRITO SILVA
DATE: 23/09/2021
TIME: 08:30
LOCAL: Ambiente virtual na plataforma meet
TITLE:

 

 

ARGUMENTATIVE SIGHT AND ENUNCIATIVE RESPONSIBILITY IN THE "ORAL ARGUMENTS" OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS IN HOMICIDE CRIMES

KEY WORDS:

 

 

 

Argumentation. Oral arguments. Jury trial. Enunciative Responsibility. Emotion. Empathy

PAGES: 229
BIG AREA: Linguística, Letras e Artes
AREA: Linguística
SUBÁREA: Teoria e Análise Linguística
SUMMARY:

The purpose of this work is to analyze the argumentative value present in the oral arguments of defense lawyers in homicide crimes and its relation with the conviction of the Jury Trial jurors. Therefore, the study aims to identify, describe, analyze and interpret the arguments in the oral arguments of criminal lawyers regarding the assumption of enunciative responsibility (RE), the point of view (POV), emotion and empathy, the from the argumentative function. Thus, a qualitative, interpretive research follows the inductive method and is based on the theoretical postulates of Textual Discourse Analysis (ATD), with Adam (2011), Rodrigues, Passeggi and Silva Neto (2016) and Rodrigues (2017) ) ), in dialogue with linguistic enunciative theories, such as Rabatel (2016) and theories of emotion with Plantin (2011), Martineau (2019), Michelli (2010) and linguistic empathy with Rabatel (2013). The research follows some well-defined criteria, they are: all cases are homicide crimes; all cases are of defendants who have been acquitted; all oral supports are available on Youtube; needed to have a case in different regions of Brazil; and have access to all acquittal sentence of the cases. In order to standardize the transcription of the corpus, which is an oral text, all four oral arguments were transcribed and passed to the norms of the Projeto da Norma Urbana Oral Culta (NURC). Due to the corpus presenting occurrences that were not marked in the transcription norms of the project, some signs were added in addition to those foreseen in the NURC. Data analysis points to the following results: the text plan of the Oral Arguments was similar to the text plan of Classical Rhetoric, presenting, however, some peculiarities; with regard to the argumentative sequence, it was observed that in all regions there appeared the sequences of the two levels, postulated by Adam (2011), the justification (P.arg 1+P.arg2+P.arg3) and the counter-argumentative (P.arg 0 and P.arg 4); as for the assumption of RE, it can be verified, mainly, by the marks of indexes of people, spatial and temporal deixis and modalities, present in every support; as for the removal from RE, it is marked by dicendi verbs, attributing the responsibility for the statement to the Federal Constitution, the Penal Code, law professors, etc; with regard to the POV, we understand that its linguistic marks promoted the argumentative orientation of the L1/E1 that certainly directly influenced the final decision of the judges, presenting an asserted POV in most of the oral arguments and a narrated POV in the narration of the facts; with regard to the emotional argument, we note that it was present in all arguments and was marked by subjective lexemes, in particular, by names of feelings, such as: fear, pain, indignation, regret, etc. ; finally, about the empathic argument, we verified that it was present in almost all the oral arguments, except for the Southeast region. The most recurrent empathic arguments were that everyone would act in the same way as the defendant, L1/E1 put themselves in the place  the jurors, to avoid future regrets, and L1/E1 put themselves in the place victim's mother.

BANKING MEMBERS:
Presidente - 349685 - MARIA DAS GRACAS SOARES RODRIGUES
Interna - 074.438.464-87 - MARISE ADRIANA MAMEDE GALVAO - UFRN
Externa à Instituição - ANA LUCIA TINOCO CABRAL
Externa à Instituição - EMILIANA SOUZA SOARES - IFRN