Banca de DEFESA: MARIA DAS VITÓRIAS DOS SANTOS MEDEIROS

Uma banca de DEFESA de DOUTORADO foi cadastrada pelo programa.
STUDENT : MARIA DAS VITÓRIAS DOS SANTOS MEDEIROS
DATE: 30/07/2020
TIME: 09:00
LOCAL: Videoconferência
TITLE:

 

 

 

 

ENUNCIATIVE RESPONSIBILITY IN THE DISCURSIVE GENRE DEFENSE AGAINST THE ACCUSATION, AND THE SOLICITATION FOR THE IMPEACHMENT OF EX-PRESIDENT DILMA ROUSSEFF

KEY WORDS:

 

 

 

Textual Discourse Analysis. Point of View. Enunciative Responsibility. Argumentation.

PAGES: 187
BIG AREA: Linguística, Letras e Artes
AREA: Linguística
SUBÁREA: Teoria e Análise Linguística
SUMMARY:

 Judicial and political discursive domains present a variety of discursive textual genres. This universe presents genres that belong to both judicial as well as political domains, which is the case of our object of investigation: the defense against an accusation, and the solicitation for the impeachment of ex-president Dilma Vanna Rousseff, which occured in 2016. In carrying out the research, our general objective was to analyze the Point of View (POV), the Enunciative Responsibility (ER), and the Argumentation in the defense text regarding the Denunciation of the Crime of Responsability nº 1, de 2015. To achieve this, our specific objectives are as follows: i) to identify the linguistic marks that contribute to the construction of the POV; ii) to identify the materialization of the (non)assumption of enunciative responsibility; iii) to recognize the argumentative organizers and markers that contribute to the construction of the author’s POV; iv) to describe the linguistic strategies that lead toward the (non) assumption of the enunciative reponsibility; v) to analyze and interpret the linguistic marks and strategies that provide the recognition of the POV, and of the (non) assumption of the enunciative responsibility. The choice of this genre is justified in its social significance as it deals with a case involving the entire country, implicating political, economic and social consequences, besides presenting characteristics that are pertinent to our theoretical approach. The corpus favors the gathering of different voices, oftentimes establishing the use of discursive argumentation. This study is characterized as qualitative-interpretivist documentary research. Our theoretical mooring is based on researches by Adam (2011, 2018, 2018a), which aim to study the (con)textual production of meanings in concrete texts. Along this line, among the angles proposed, we focus on POV, enunciative responsibility, and argumentative orientation. Dialoguing with this approach we present studies by Rabatel  (2008, 2009, 2015, 2016, 2017), addressing these categories, configuring thus, an enunciative and discursive approach. Similarly, we include Guentchévá (1994, 2011, 2014) to address mediativity and evidentiality. The analysis of the data reveals the presence of the POV of the S/E1 (first speaker enunciator), in relation to the enunciative responsibility in two moves: (1) the imputation, in other words, the (non)assumption of enunciative responsibility, and (2) the assumption of enunciative responsibility . The factors most frequently evoked by the S1/E1, the Attorney General, José Eduardo Cardoso, were: reported discourse (direct and indirect), the media framework (secondary enunciators), indexes of people, verbal expressions in the first person, modal expressions (evaluative lexemes), along with typographical marks (in bold and italics) and the graphic sign of quotation marks. The argumentation appears also from the evaluative lexemes that reveal enunciative-argumentative stances of the S1/E1. The use of these enunciative devices, in the textual discursive genre under analysis, reveals enunciative-argumentative stances of the S1/E1 in relation to the POVs of the secondary-enunciators. This occurs in the following ways: (1) in the agreement, through the conjunction of the POV, of the S1/E1 with the e2, and (2) the disagreement, through textual devices that refute the POV of the S1/E1 with the POV of the e2, revealing, thus a contrary POV. Finally, the analysis shows that the managing of voices and the organization of the POV frame the construction of the argumentative sway in defense of the accused.

BANKING MEMBERS:
Externa ao Programa - 3351562 - CELIA MARIA DE MEDEIROS
Externa ao Programa - 349683 - JOSILETE ALVES MOREIRA DE AZEVEDO
Interno - 349707 - LUIS ALVARO SGADARI PASSEGGI
Presidente - 349685 - MARIA DAS GRACAS SOARES RODRIGUES
Externa à Instituição - MARIA DAS VITORIAS NUNES SILVA LOURENCO
Externa à Instituição - SUELI CRISTINA MARQUESI - PUC - SP