Banca de DEFESA: JOSÉ IRANILSON DA SILVA

Uma banca de DEFESA de DOUTORADO foi cadastrada pelo programa.
STUDENT : JOSÉ IRANILSON DA SILVA
DATE: 31/07/2020
TIME: 09:00
LOCAL: video conferência
TITLE:

TEXT PLAN AND ARGUING GUIDE: PROSECUTION AND DEFENSE IN DILMA ROUSSEFF’S IMPEACHMENT

KEY WORDS:

Discourse Textual Analysis. Text Plan. Arguing Guide.

PAGES: 150
BIG AREA: Linguística, Letras e Artes
AREA: Linguística
SUBÁREA: Teoria e Análise Linguística
SUMMARY:

In this doctoral thesis, we have investigated the relation between text plan and arguing guide in the making of prosecution and defense of President Dilma Rousseff’s Impeachment process. text plan and arguing guide act as two levels of analysis present in the theoretical-methodological framework of the discourse textual analysis, developed by Jean-Michel Adam (2011).  We set up a linguistic analysis intended to interconnect these two theoretical levels so that in level 5 (N5) we focused on text plan, and in level 8 (N8), arguing guide was privileged. The corpus is made up of texts composed by two papers of this same process, that is, the accusation (accusatory piece), where we analyze the section “Of the facts”, and the defense (answer to accusation), the defense piece of the accused president, the section “of general contextualization”. As research subjects, we investigated the structures of the text plan, how it acts upon the arguing guide, how the arguing guide stands out and how it manifests on the text plans, and what is the role of the arguing linguistic marks in the text plans. The objective behind this procedure was to investigate how the arguing function of the text plan is established and, further, to identify and describe the text plan of the documents and capture the connection of these two levels of textual analysis, that is, text plan and arguing guide, especially their linguistic elements. In its theoretical aspects, the research foundation is based on Adam’s (2011) Textual Linguistic (TL) and theoretical background of the Discourse Textual Analysis (DTA). In what concerns the studies on argumentation, our supports are Aristotle (1969 [384-322 a.C]), Perelman e Olbrechts-Tyteca (1996), Koch (2009, 2011), Pinto (2010), Fiorin (2014, 2015) e Adam (2014). Besides the text plan and the arguing guide categories, we also analyzed the linguistic marks of argumentation through argumentative operators, presupposition of the discourse modalities and polyphonic authority. Respecting methodology, it consisted of deductive and inductive procedures. The nature of the resources was documental and bibliographic, without neglecting an analytical interpretation of descriptive character. Results show that the plans of the analyzed texts reveal arguing strategies which gain a specific trace in accordance with the accusation or defense roles, establishing relation to an arguing guide that comes up with the aid of linguistic marks.

BANKING MEMBERS:
Presidente - 337223 - JOAO GOMES DA SILVA NETO
Interna - 349685 - MARIA DAS GRACAS SOARES RODRIGUES
Interna - 358.312.864-87 - CELIA MARIA MEDEIROS BARBOSA DA SILVA - UFRN
Externa ao Programa - 349683 - JOSILETE ALVES MOREIRA DE AZEVEDO
Externo ao Programa - 1168647 - MARIO LOURENCO DE MEDEIROS
Externa à Instituição - MARIA ELIETE DE QUEIROZ - UERN
Externo à Instituição - ANANIAS AGOSTINHO DA SILVA - UFERSA