Banca de QUALIFICAÇÃO: LAVÍNIA MABEL VIANA LOPES

Uma banca de QUALIFICAÇÃO de DOUTORADO foi cadastrada pelo programa.
STUDENT : LAVÍNIA MABEL VIANA LOPES
DATE: 22/11/2023
TIME: 15:00
LOCAL: Remoto
TITLE:

MARKS OF A PANDEMIC IN BRAZIL: BIOETHICAL ANALYSIS OF FACTORS RELATED TO THE BRAZILIAN STATE'S POSTURE TOWARDS COVID-19

KEY WORDS:

Bioethics; Covid-19; Pandemics; Public Health; Brazil.R

PAGES: 101
BIG AREA: Ciências da Saúde
AREA: Saúde Coletiva
SUBÁREA: Saúde Pública
SUMMARY:

Brazil came to occupy second place in the absolute number of deaths from Covid-19 and, in March 2021, it was considered the global epicenter of the pandemic. The lack of adoption of alternatives for managing the health crisis that privileged the principles, methods and practices of epidemiological surveillance to combat it allowed this scenario. Added to this, scientific denialism on the part of the Brazilian federal government continued to be established in the country, with the perpetuation of discourses of contempt for universities and the rights of the most vulnerable populations. This thesis aims to analyze, using the Bioethics of Intervention, factors related to the Brazilian state's stance towards Covid-19. This documentary research is a Case Study with a qualitative approach. Multiple sources were used to collect data: health guidelines published by ANVISA; official statements by the federal government during the Covid-19 pandemic; and Covid-19 CPI Final Report. The results were analyzed using Thematic Content Analysis. The results are arranged in three sections: (1) article submitted entitled “The Covid-19 CPI: a bioethical analysis of what was revealed in the management of the pandemic”. This article aims to discuss, based on the main findings of the Covid-19 CPI, the stance of the Brazilian federal government and its consequences in the management of the pandemic, in the light of Intervention Bioethics; (2) preliminary data from the second article: “Management of the Covid-19 Pandemic in perspective: bioethical inconsistencies between ANVISA and the Brazilian federal government”. This article presents data collected in ANVISA publications about health guidelines for combating the Covid-19 pandemic, and seeks to analyze points of ethical inconsistency between the measures proposed and those adopted by the federal government; and (3) preliminary data from the third article: “Bolsonaro, Covid-19 and Bioethics: analysis of official pronouncements by the federal government during the pandemic”, which analyzes, using the Bioethics of Intervention, the official pronouncements of the federal government during the pandemic of Covid-19 in 2020. After the qualification exam, it is expected to lead the research towards the final paths, seeking to expand the literature review, include new results and discussion of the analyzed data

COMMITTEE MEMBERS:
Presidente - 4308027 - KARLA PATRICIA CARDOSO AMORIM
Interna - ***.382.224-** - CLÁUDIA HELENA SOARES DE MORAIS FREITAS - UFPB
Interna - 1879353 - FABIA BARBOSA DE ANDRADE
Externo ao Programa - 153847 - RICARDO WAGNER DE SOUZA ALCANTARA - UFRN