Banca de DEFESA: KARINNA SONÁLYA AIRES DA COSTA

Uma banca de DEFESA de DOUTORADO foi cadastrada pelo programa.
STUDENT : KARINNA SONÁLYA AIRES DA COSTA
DATE: 15/09/2020
TIME: 14:00
LOCAL: VIDEOCONFERÊNCIA
TITLE:

COMPARISON BETWEEN SENSORY MOTOR TRAINING AND MUSCLE STRENGTHENING FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH SUBACROMIAL PAIN SYNDROME: A RANDOMIZED AND BLIND STUDY

KEY WORDS:

Electromyography; Pain in the shoulder; Physiotherapy; Exercise therapy.

PAGES: 85
BIG AREA: Ciências da Saúde
AREA: Fisioterapia e Terapia Ocupacional
SUMMARY:

Introduction: the subacromial pain syndrome is known as a compression of the subacromial tissues, mainly due to the narrowing of this space. Its etiology is wide, however, imbalances in muscle relationships and in the time of activation of these muscles can influence the functional prognosis of these patients. Objective: The aim of this study was to compare a sensory motor training protocol with a muscle strengthening protocol in patients with subacromial pain syndrome. Methods: this is a randomized, blinded trial, composed of 22 volunteers of both genders, with a mean age of 48.9 ± 7.9 years. All volunteers are submitted to a previous evaluation (Av1) where they were measured: pain, function (SPADI), range of motion, muscle strength, relationship between electromyographic activities and kinematics of the shoulder complex. After the initial evaluation, the volunteers were randomly divided into two groups to perform the interventions: exercise group (GE - muscle strengthening exercises, n = 11) and motor sensory group (GSM - motor control training, n = 11). The intervention protocols were perfomed for 8 weeks. After four weeks of intervention, the second evaluation (AV2) was perfomed, identical to AV1, adding, however, the global change perception questionnaire in this and in the following evaluations. At the end of the intervention protocols, the third evaluations (AV3) was performed and, finally, a follow-up was performed 4 weeks after the end of the intervention protocols. Statistical Analysis: was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0 for Windows, following the principles of analysis by intention to treat. In the descriptive analysis we used the mean as a measure of central tendency and the standard deviation as a measure of dispersion. A mixed model ANOVA was performed for intra and intergroup comparisons. Results: both groups had a reduction in painful sensation. Still in relation to pain, at follow-up, there is an intergroup difference for the sensory motor group, when compared to the muscle strengthening group. For the SAPDI variables, range of motion, joint strength, muscle strength and the relationship between electromyographic activity between the evalueted muscles, there was no difference between the groups. In the kinematic evaluation of the upper scapular rotation, the results showed intergroup differences in 30 and 60 degrees, with increased scores for the sensory motor group. Conclusion: both intervention protocols produced clinically important responses for patients with SIS, however, it was observed that gains in GSM last for a longer time, when compared to GE.

BANKING MEMBERS:
Externa à Instituição - ANAMARIA SIRIANI DE OLIVEIRA - USP
Interna - 1081828 - CATARINA DE OLIVEIRA SOUSA
Presidente - 1149610 - JAMILSON SIMOES BRASILEIRO
Externo à Instituição - JOSÉ JAMACY DE ALMEIDA FERREIRA - UFPB
Externo ao Programa - 2218684 - MARCELO CARDOSO DE SOUZA