Banca de DEFESA: DANIEL VICTOR ALVES BORGES RODRIGUES

Uma banca de DEFESA de MESTRADO foi cadastrada pelo programa.
DISCENTE : DANIEL VICTOR ALVES BORGES RODRIGUES
DATA : 23/06/2017
HORA: 17:00
LOCAL: Laboratório 2 de Antropologia
TÍTULO:

CONSENSUS GRAMMARS: LIMITS AND POSSIBILITIES OF THE USE OF THE AUTOCOMPOSITIVE MEDIA (MEDIATION AND CONCILIATION) AT THE JUDICIARY CENTER FOR CONFLICT SOLUTION AND CITIZENSHIP IN FORTALEZA-CE.

PALAVRAS-CHAVES:

Keywords: Anthropology of Law, Consensus. Judicial Mediation.

PÁGINAS: 125
GRANDE ÁREA: Ciências Humanas
ÁREA: Antropologia
SUBÁREA: Antropologia Urbana
RESUMO:

This dissertation discusses the idea of consensus and the different forms of conflict management in the Judicial Center for Conflict Resolution and Citizenship (Cejusc), in the city of Fortaleza, State of Ceará, under the aegis of anthropology of law. In order to understand how different meanings are given about new judicial practices in conflict management, I focused my attention on the treatment of mediators and conciliators to the processes that are sent to Cejusc / Clóvis Beviláqua Forum, where I conducted ethnographic research. The research made it possible to perceive the different nuances of a practice of handling the ascending conflicts that faces the old practices of vertical administration of the conflicts. The results of the research indicate that there is a proposal in the structuring phase of a "new" justice, understood by its operators from their experiences, ranging from a new way of managing conflicts, decentralizing the decision of the judge, focusing The participation of those involved in the resolution of conflicts and the notion of equity and, on the other, in the reiteration of the old judicial practices, in which the referral of the phases of the proceedings in court continue to depend fundamentally on the action of a single subject, the judge. The construction of consensus, in this perspective, is tied to an attempt to achieve orality as a fundamental principle for access to justice at broader levels. The work is divided into four chapters. In the introduction I present the reader with my trajectory in the area and how I performed the research and the differences between the means of self-composition (mediation and conciliation) in theoretical terms. In the first chapter I try to delimit the field of the Anthropology of Law, starting from the contribution of several anthropologists in the construction of this discipline and to see how Brazilian legal culture is structured. In the second chapter, I bring to the reader information about the empirical field where I conducted the research, present the Judicial Center for Conflict Resolution at the national level, I also present the legislation pertinent to the area and describe the institutional daily life of the CEJUSC of the Clóvis Beviláqua Forum. In the third chapter, in general, I talked about the formation of conciliators and mediators, delimiting the trajectory of these subjects as new professions in the Judiciary. In the fourth chapter I analyzed the practices of mediation and conciliation trying to understand how this new way of managing the conflicts finds space (or not) in a Judiciary focused on the procedural line.

MEMBROS DA BANCA:
Presidente - 1642956 - JULIANA GONCALVES MELO
Interno - 067.038.576-01 - LILIAN LEITE CHAVES - UnB
Interno - 1360691 - RITA DE CASSIA MARIA NEVES
Externo à Instituição - BÁRBARA GOMES LUPETTI BAPTISTA - UFF